Major U.S. Study Says Vaping Is “Conclusively Safer Than Smoking”

A detailed American scientific study of vaping backed by the FDA has concluded that e-cigarettes are much safer than smoking – the first time any Government backed report has done so.

However the Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes isn’t all a love-fest of vaping with some curious findings that go against what we’ve learned so far – more on those later.

OK scientists from the powerful National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine came out with a total of 47 pieces of evidence proving vaping is far far safer than lit tobacco and this is the first major study from the USA to do so.

Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes

Their findings almost mirror those of Public Health England who categorically say vaping is 95% safer than smoking and have done so for some time.

Indeed the 47 points in favour of vaping is graded in the study with ‘conclusive’ being the strongest and the report states:

..there is conclusive evidence that completely substituting e-cigarettes for combustible tobacco cigarettes reduces users’ exposure to numerous toxicants and carcinogens present in combustible tobacco cigarettes.

The team of experts trawled though over 800 pieces of peer reviewed studies to reach their conclusions and the key positive findings are:

  • There is substantial evidence that except for nicotine, exposure to potentially toxic substances from e-cigarettes (under typical conditions of use) is significantly lower compared with conventional cigarettes.
  • There is conclusive evidence that completely substituting e-cigarettes for conventional cigarettes reduces users’ exposure to many toxicants and carcinogens present in conventional cigarettes.
  • There is substantial evidence that completely switching from regular use of conventional cigarettes to e-cigarettes results in reduced short-term adverse health outcomes in several organ systems.

There’s Good News And Not So Good News!

However it isn’t all good news and indeed considering this is such a high powered and well respected body of experts – some of their conclusions particularly those with ‘moderate’ evidence leave a lot to be desired.

Take their findings on so called passive vaping – something I thought we’d blown away as a myth.

Not so say the experts:

  • There is conclusive evidence that e-cigarette use increases airborne concentrations of particulate matter and nicotine in indoor environments compared with background levels.
  • There is moderate evidence that second-hand exposure to nicotine and particulates is lower from e-cigarettes compared with conventional cigarettes.

Well of course the vapour we exhale being denser than the surrounding air is going to add to the short term – but what’s in that vapour is and has been proven to be harmless!

wales vaping

I guess that tit-bit of fact won’t stop the mainstream media pouncing and it’s the same as the ‘safety’ aspects around e-cigarettes which I’m sure will get more air-time than the positives.

  • There is conclusive evidence that e-cigarettes can explode and cause burns and projectile injuries. Such risk is significantly increased when batteries are of poor quality, stored improperly, or are being modified by users.
  • There is conclusive evidence that intentional or accidental exposure to e-liquids (from drinking, eye contact, or skin contact) can result in adverse health effects such as seizures, anoxic brain injury, vomiting, and lactic acidosis.
  • There is conclusive evidence that intentionally or accidentally drinking or injecting e-liquids can be fatal.

Those three make for grim reading and I’m not about to make light of those findings – but I will say this:

  • The industry does all it can to promote battery and device use safety – how many mobile phones and laptops blow up without media scrutiny?
  • The same can be said for household detergents such as bleach.
  • Users of e-liquids are told NOT TO INGEST – if they do then it’s a mental health issue not a vaping issue.

On that last one I’d add it’s OK to buy a gun in the USA but e-liquid needs to be carefully considered because of its dangers?

Doesn’t make much sense to this old English bloke.

Yeah You Guessed It – What About The Kids?

Sadly and once again the door has been left open for the ‘what about the kiddies’ anti-vape brigade with findings that goes against the grain of similar studies conducted here in the UK.

The study states:

There is substantial evidence that e-cigarette use by youth and young adults increases their risk of ever using conventional cigarettes.

Quite where they get this grandiose statement from – as in what peer reviewed study findings – isn’t made clear – but I can guess lol – look all up to date evidence suggests that so called young vapers are tiny – more like minuscule – in number and come from smoking which is far worse for their health!

cancer-research-uk-kids-smoking-stats

See my article Once Again…NO Vaping Does NOT Lead Kids To Smoking to see how I rebuffed that study coming out of California.

This whole vaping is good vaping is bad argument between scientists – the media – vape advocates – bloggers and the likes of me – is a bit like a game of tennis but with significantly more important outcomes to any eventual winners.

Of course the scientists who came up with this study aren’t resting on their laurels and why should they given the Government cash cow will fund such studies – and yes they are calling for ‘more studies’ and ‘more evidence’ around vaping.

I still wonder why there’s so much almost microscopic studying going on into the whole vaping thing.

The cynic in me can’t believe the vast majority of these studies are coming from a 100% hand on heart swearing on all this holy genuine desire to find out once and for all if they’re safe or not.

Vaping studies are dare I say fashionable and these scientists and researchers ain’t stupid.

They know there’s plenty of backers out there – some with good intentions others with bad – willing to hand over a nice chunk of change with the added bonus of a named peer reviewed paper and 15 minutes of fame.

Tsk Tsk I’m such a cynic lol.

And that’s why we should remember that for every scientific positive we get faced by a scientific negative with a call for more cash and more studies.

OK I’m probably being a little too cynical and will of course take the positives’ from this particular study and welcome them – shame about the negatives but hey what can ya do!

So Is This A Game Changer For American Vapers?

In conclusion to the study the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine say they believe in the short term e-cigarettes will and are having a positive impact on the health of vapers:

Until more definite scientific data are available, population modeling can help estimate the balance of potential benefits and harms. Under the assumption that e-cigarette use increases the rate at which adults quit conventional smoking, modeling projects that use of e-cigarettes will generate a net public health benefit, at least in the short run.

The harms caused by the higher rate of conventional cigarette smoking among youth who had used e-cigarettes will take decades to appear. For long-range projections, the net public health benefit is substantially less, and under some scenarios the net impact is harmful.

vaping study findings

Maximizing the potential health benefits associated with e-cigarettes, the report says, will require determining with more precision whether and under what conditions e-cigarettes help people quit smoking; discouraging e-cigarette use among youth through education and access restrictions; and increasing the devices’ safety through data-driven engineering and design.

Like I said these days we have to take any positives – so is this really a ‘game changer’ as I called it for the average vaper in the US?

It could be – especially if the American vaping advocacy groups get their acts together and begin promoting the positives.

As always we’ll let you know of any developments.

You can read the full report here: The Public Health Consequences Of E-Cigarettes

Neil Humber
I began vaping in 2012 and found it easy to give up a 40 per day roll-up habit! DTL: Lost Vape DNA75C BF - Dead Rabbit SQ - MTL: JacVapour Sandstorm DNA 75 + Augvape Merlin Nano RTA...Daily set-up Lost Vape DNA 250c and Geekvape Zeus X I'm a former journalist and now a writer and author.. I'm an Army veteran - adore dogs and never happier than with a good book on a beach.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here